Pros, cons and head-scratchers: The possible new NHL arena locations in Ottawa

An old city works yard, the woefully under-used baseball stadium, even the Department of National Defence tower on Colonel By Drive could soon be home to the Ottawa Senators.

Despite the fact the Ottawa Senators inked a preliminary deal with the National Capital Commission(NCC) last summer to build anew arena on a portion of land on the western end of LeBreton Flats, there are a number of alternate rink sites being floated in public.

• ANALYSIS |NHL commissioner puts non-LeBreton Flats arena locations in play
• ANALYSIS |The big 3 Ottawa Senators unknowns

Some suggestions have been around for years, stemming from the last time the Senators looked at relocating to the centre of the city from Kanata. Others have been suggested by journalists reporting on the behind-the-scenes bids to buy the local franchise. Some have been suggested recently by the mayor of Ottawa himself.

All locations, even LeBreton, have their pros and cons. And some suggestions elicit raised eyebrowsand head scratching.

As a starting point, consider the arena and lands at the Canadian Tire Centre in Kanata is 32 hectares, or 80 acres, including the vast parking lots. That's bigger than all of LeBreton Flats, which is about 29 hectares. New owners could decide to stay there indefinitely or while they negotiate some sort of land deal.

It's also key to know the footprints of existing arenas. Winnipeg's Canada Life Centre, one of the league's most compact arenas, takes upjust 1.27 hectares, or about threeacres. Montreal's Bell Centre with one of the league's largest seat capacitiestakes up1.6hectares, or a little under 4 acres, of downtown land.

Here's the lowdown on the most-mentioned possible alternate arena sites. (Land areas and other information taken from the city's GeoOttawa site, unless otherwise noted).

LeBreton land on offer

Location:Albert Street, between Preston Street and City Centre Avenue.

Area: 2.56 hectares or6.3 acres, according to the NCC's website.

Pros: Relatively centrally located, and within walking distance of two LRT stations Pimisi and Bayview although not attached to either. While amemorandum of understanding between the NCC and the Sens isn't binding on the new owners, it's a process that is well underway, meaning it's likely the fastest place to build a new arena (which will take years). The NCC is also in the process of developing the Albert Street district over the next several years.

Cons:As NHLcommissioner Gary Bettmannot-so-subtly pointed out when he was in town on Monday, some consider the land to be "a bit small." The property would accommodate the arena, but not much other real estate development that often subsidizesrink costs in smaller markets. There may be an option to add more NCC land to the existing deal, for a price of course. There's also not much capacity for parking, although there would be some parking at the City Centre.

WATCH | The NHL's commissioner on the LeBreton land:

Lebreton parcel 'struck me as being a little small,' NHL commissioner says

1 year ago

Duration 1:00

Asked about the parcel of land at LeBreton Flats set aside for a potential new arena for the Ottawa Senators, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman said he has questions about the size of the land, but "there are options downtown."

City-owned lands mentioned by mayor

Last week, Mayor Mark Sutcliffesuggested on TSN 1200 there are other options for an arena that aren't LeBreton Flats. He specifically named the city-owned lands at Bayview Yards, theRCGT Park baseball stadium andproperty around the Hurdmantransit station.

Using municipal land raises the significant question of whether the city would sell the land or partner with the new owners. It's much too early to discuss any of these issues, said Sutcliffe. And when asked specifically if anyone had approached him or his office about putting an arena at any of these locations, he said definitively, "no."

Bayview Yards

Location: Land north of Scott Street and eastof BayviewStation Road.

Area: 5.42 hectares or 13.4 acres.

Pros:On both the east-west and north-south rail transit systems. At twice the size of the LeBreton property, Bayview offers new owners more space for a real-estate play to help subsidize the arena. Or perhaps the city can strike a deal formore affordable housing. There's a heritage building on the site, which is currently the Innovation Centre, but even with this protected structure,there's plenty ofdevelopment opportunity at this site.

Cons:Area is farther from downtown, and not near any sort of built-up commercial strip. In fact, it's not even near a planned commercial strip. Like LeBreton, there is not a lot of commercial parking nearby or major arterial road capacity, and the land is contaminated, which would add to the cost of developing.

RCGT Park baseball stadium

Location:302 Coventry Rd.

Area: 6.57 hectares or 16.2 acres.

Pros: This property gives new owners more than two-and-a-half times the land to play with than at LeBreton. The transportation options are also ideal, as the site is accessible to theLRT, HIghway 417 and the Vanier Parkway. There's also more opportunity for parking.

Cons: Location. This is hardly the vibrant downtown locale boasted by so many other league franchises, nor does it offer much opportunity to create an urban entertainment and hospitality district.

Hurdman

Location: TheHurdman transit hub.

Area: 10 hectares or 24 acres, but in an hourglass shape.

Pros: Thisbig ifoddly shapedcity property offersopportunity for some sort of development andpossible parking. And, of course, it's right on the LRT line.

Cons:This site scores poorly in the dynamic-urban city building category. It's well outside the core with little chance of being developed into a new vibrant entertainment community. The city has identified these lands, as well as the surrounding NCC properties, as potential areas for affordable housing, but it's hard to see how theNCCwill comeon boardif the city puts an arena there.

Floating federal lands options

Aside from NCC-controlled LeBreton, a number of federal properties keep coming up as potential arena sites. Some of the locations had been looked at in earlier attempts to find a downtown arena site, and resurface every few years. Others seem to be wild rumours.

It must be said that the feds have not indicated a modicum ofinterest in selling or leasing any of these properties. Negotiations for these lands would take years, if they ever got off the ground. And the fedswon't cutany sort of deal for an NHL team, either, especially after denying Quebec City anyfederal funds for their rink.

RCMP lands

Location:1200 Vanier Pkwy.

Area:15 hectaresor 37 acres.

Pros: The site is massive and shares the same transportation upsides as the city's baseball stadium, which is on the other side of Vanier Parkway.

Cons:The main structureis a recognized federal heritage building. And, according to the RCMP, more than 1,000 people still work there.

DND downtown complex

Location: 101 Colonel By Dr., just north of the Laurier Avenue Bridge.

Area: Twohectares orfiveacres.

Pros:Great central location overlooking the Rideau Canal, a UNESCO World Heritage site. Public parking options nearby.

Cons: It's actually smaller than the current LeBreton offering, and heritage folks may have some issues with rink designs and a profile overlooking the heritage-protected canal (as they did with the Shaw Centre). There's also the fact that 1,675 Department of National Defence employees currently work there, if on a hybrid basis.

LeBreton at Booth Street

Location: On Albert Street, just west of Booth Street.

Area: TBD, but likely larger than the 2.56 hectares of the current LeBreton proposal.

Pros: Closer to downtown the location has a more centre-ice feel to it than the proposed arena site. Right atPimisi station that could possibly be connected to the events complex. Opportunity for more real estate, and can take advantage of the 200 parking spotsat the new central library.

Cons:Would require the NCCand its board to revisit the LeBreton Flats master plan to swap land around. Would also funnel transit-riding visitors to a single LRT station.

Confederation Park

Location: Elgin Street, between the National Arts Centre and Laurier Avenue West.

Area:2.5hectaresor 6.2 acres.

Pros:This is a dream location, right in the middle of downtown action. It's on transit and near plenty of public parking, not to mention Elgin Street bars and restaurants, and the Rideau Centre. It's about the same size as the parcel being offered at LeBreton Flats.

Cons: The wildest of the wildcard possible arena locations being floated out there. The park is the only open green space in the area the next closest greenery is Major's Hill Park and it's hard to see what would possess the NCC, which oversees Confederation Park, to part with it.

Private plan

South Sandy Hill

Location: 2 Robinson Ave. and 320 Lees Ave.

Area: 2.2 hectares or 5 acres, according to a City of Ottawa report.

Pros: A pie-shaped slice of land on Robinson, just east of Nicholas Street, attached to a rectangular chunk that hugs Lees. A Montreal-based developer has a council-approved plan for a mixed-use development with four highrises here. It's relatively central, near the University of Ottawa and the Lees LRT station. with access to Highway 417.

Cons: Even though it's closer to downtown than some of the other locations swirling around the rumour mill, it's hard to see a new arena plopped into the largely residential Sandy Hill community. It's also not clear which, if any, bidding group is lobbying for this location.