Dr. Brian Nadler fires back at Hawkesbury Hospital, staff with $20M lawsuit

Dr. Brian Nadler, the physician acquitted this week of first-degree murder and criminal negligencefor his role in the deaths of four patients under his care, is suing the hospital where he worked at the time of his arrest, accusing staff there of making an "abrupt, erroneous and defamatory decision to involve police."

Nadler, his motherSusan Epstein and sister Erica Nadlerare all listed as plaintiffs in the suitfiledin April 2023, while Nadler was still fighting the criminal charges against him.

They're seeking damagestotalling $20 millionfrom the Hawkesbury and District General Hospital and 21 employees,including the hospital's chief of staff and chief of general medicine at the time, for defamation, abuse of process and conspiracy.

In a statement of defence filed thisApril, the defendants deny all allegations outlined by Nadler and his family.

Nadler was a physician at the hospital when he was arrested in March 2021 and subsequently charged with the deaths of four patients between the ages of 79 and 93.

The civil suit is separate from Nadler's criminal casein which he was acquitted on Tuesday of all eight counts against himincluding four charges of first-degree murder and four counts of criminal negligence causing death.

Nadler was accused of intentionally overmedicating his patients, causing their deaths. He has maintained that the patients all died from COVID-19.

In the statement of claim, Nadler and his family explain how they "have suffered from the extreme stigma and hardship of having to live under the burden of responding to these charges."

While the criminal charges made their way through the courts, theCollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario suspended Nadler's medicallicenceand he was unable to work.

Nadler argues police relied on false statements made by theformer colleagues he's now suing.

Hospital broke COVID-19 protocol:Nadler

The statement of claim describes how the hospital was dealing with multiple COVID-19 outbreaks in March 2021, with Nadler assigned as lead treating physician for COVID-positive patients.

Nadler said he raised numerous concerns at the time, including how the hospital broke provincial guidelines and in some casesfailed to adequately isolate COVID patients, exposingother high-risk patients to the virus.

"In his view, this was being done to free up beds for new patients and to limit the number of patients in isolation," because "the hospital was concerned about the financial consequences" of doing so, reads the statement of claim.

The hospital was also dealing with a multi-million-dollar budget deficit at the time.

Nadler claims all his concerns were ignored, however. Six of his patients died from COVID-19 in March 2021, and Nadler saidineach case"their deaths were imminent" when he provided palliative care.

He argues his treatment "was consistent with the standard of practice in respect of palliative care," and says numerous hospital staffincluding doctors, nurses and others were aware of the medicationhe was prescribing and administering to his patients.

"None of them intervened," reads Nadler's statement of claim.

Hospital alleges 'concerning behaviour'

In theirstatement of defence, the hospital and other defendants say Nadler began showing "concerning behaviour" after being assigned to a dedicated COVID-19 ward in March 2021, in the chaotic early days of the pandemic.

"He was reportedly not sleeping or eating. He sent bizarre and troubling emails to physicians," the statement of defence says.

Nadler's communication at the time "seemed paranoid and grandiose," they say.Onecolleague noted he seemed to have "pressured speech" and cried.

"Some leaders were aware that Dr. Nadler had had mental health issues in the past," according to the statement of defence.

The defendants claim hospital leaders met with Nadler to determine if he needed rest and relief, offering to have otherstake on some of his patient load.

"Dr. Nadler reassured them and denied offers of assistance," the statement of defence says.

In a response filed in court, Nadler denies showing such "concerning behaviour" and claims that if he had exhibited suchbehaviour, he would have been immediately removed from the hospital and prevented from caring for patients.

He argues the allegation of his previous mental health issuesis "unattributed hearsay" that stigmatises mental illness and does not justify calling police or other actions taken against him.

In his statement of claim, Nadler says the defendants are continuing a smear campaign against him"to portray his actions in a negative light."

Police called as concerns rose

Court documents show different accounts of how Nadler's arrest unfolded.

Nadler argues it was the actions of anurse on duty the night of March 25, 2021, that ultimately led to his arrest.

He describes in court documents how he was treating a patient for end-of-life suffering, but a nurse told hospital staff he was preventing anyone from entering that patient's room and was "prescribing and/or administering lethal doses of medication."

Those concerns were shared with senior staffwho then called 911 to report that Nadler "had murdered patients and was in the process of murdering another patient."

Nadler saysat no point were these concerns brought to his attention, nor did staff tryto intervene at any time.

"Not one of them attempted to reverse any medication Dr. Nadler had prescribed," according to his statement of claim.

Nadler was arrested by police that eveningand charged with the murder of that patient.

"Disturbingly, Patient No. 6 was still alive when Dr. Nadler was charged with their murder," according to his statement of claim. He later describes how that patient succumbed to COVID-19 the following day.

Nadlerargues the escalation was"unprecedented, unfair, deliberately misinformed, and legally actionable," and describesthe nurse's assessment of his actions as ignorant.

The hospital and other defendants argue there were "immediate concerns" he may have been harming patients on the evening of March 25, 2021.

Staff reported him ordering excessive amounts of potentially lethal medicationfor patients, communicating aggressively with nursing staff, administering medicationhimself and refusing to allow nursing staff access to a patient room.

"Grave concerns had arisen in the view of the Hospital concerning Dr. Nadler with respect to his treatment of patients, dosing of medication by him, his interactions with staff and nurses and his conduct," reads the statement of defence.

Another doctor, at home at the time and receiving these reports, decided to "urgently" attend the hospital. In a rural area with no on-site security, that doctor also decided to call police.

"It was determined that staff should not confront Dr. Nadler without police support to minimize any risks to staff, patients or Dr. Nadler," the defence alleges.

Police arrested Nadler in connection with the death of four patients under his care.

Nadler says the hospital had been satisfied with his care up until its "abrupt, erroneous and defamatory decision to involve police."

He argues staff asked to be "involved in confronting Dr. Nadler" and it is "impossible to understand why he was viewed as such a threat that police intervention was required."

Nadler claimed that each defendant purposely provided or directed others "to provide false, misleading, inaccurate" statements and information to police in order to cause him harm.

None of the allegations made by either party has been tested in court.

Nadler's lawyerJordan Goldblattwould not provide comment "while the allegations in his claim are before the Court."

CBCalso reached out to the legal representatives ofHawkesbury Hospital and staff, but did not receive a response.

While Nadler was declared innocent in criminal court earlier this week, the Crown in that case said it wouldreserve the right to appeal pre-trial rulings excluding certain evidenceand requesta new trial.